Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
a) 5. This excerpt describes circumstances that led to the 1967 Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia. In June, 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia pursuant to its laws Shortly after their marriage , the Lovings returned to Virginia and established their marital abode in Caroline County. At the October Term, 1958, of the Circuit Court of Caroline County, a grand jury issued an indictment charging the Lovings with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge, and were sentenced to one year in jail; however, the trial judge suspended the sentence for a period of 25 years on the condition that the Lovings leave the State and not return to Virginia together for 25 years. -Legal Information Institute, www.law.cornell.edu (accessed May 9,2019) Why did the U.S.Supreme Court unanimously rule that Virginia's interracial marriage law was unconstitutional? The ban violated the principle of federalism described in the Tenth Amendment. The ban violated the equal protection and due process clauses found in the Fourteenth Amendment. The ban violated the right to a jury trial in the Sixth Amendment. The ban violated the right to free exercise of religion in the First Amendment.

Problemas

a) 5. This excerpt describes circumstances that led to the 1967 Supreme Court
case Loving v. Virginia.
In June, 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman and
Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia
pursuant to its laws Shortly after their marriage , the Lovings returned to
Virginia and established their marital abode in Caroline County. At the
October Term, 1958, of the Circuit Court of Caroline County, a grand jury
issued an indictment charging the Lovings with violating Virginia's ban on
interracial marriages. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the
charge, and were sentenced to one year in jail; however, the trial judge
suspended the sentence for a period of 25 years on the condition that the
Lovings leave the State and not return to Virginia together for 25 years.
-Legal Information Institute, www.law.cornell.edu (accessed May 9,2019)
Why did the U.S.Supreme Court unanimously rule that Virginia's interracial
marriage law was unconstitutional?
The ban violated the principle of federalism described in the
Tenth Amendment.
The ban violated the equal protection and due process
clauses found in the Fourteenth Amendment.
The ban violated the right to a jury trial in the Sixth
Amendment.
The ban violated the right to free exercise of religion in the
First Amendment.

a) 5. This excerpt describes circumstances that led to the 1967 Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia. In June, 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia pursuant to its laws Shortly after their marriage , the Lovings returned to Virginia and established their marital abode in Caroline County. At the October Term, 1958, of the Circuit Court of Caroline County, a grand jury issued an indictment charging the Lovings with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge, and were sentenced to one year in jail; however, the trial judge suspended the sentence for a period of 25 years on the condition that the Lovings leave the State and not return to Virginia together for 25 years. -Legal Information Institute, www.law.cornell.edu (accessed May 9,2019) Why did the U.S.Supreme Court unanimously rule that Virginia's interracial marriage law was unconstitutional? The ban violated the principle of federalism described in the Tenth Amendment. The ban violated the equal protection and due process clauses found in the Fourteenth Amendment. The ban violated the right to a jury trial in the Sixth Amendment. The ban violated the right to free exercise of religion in the First Amendment.

Solución

avatar
Camilamaestro · Tutor durante 5 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.1 (200 votos)

Responder

B

Explicar

## Step 1<br />The problem is a multiple-choice question related to a historical Supreme Court case, Loving v. Virginia. The case involved the constitutionality of Virginia's interracial marriage law. The Supreme Court ruled that this law was unconstitutional.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The Supreme Court's decision was based on the violation of the equal protection and due process clauses found in the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees that no state shall "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The Supreme Court found that Virginia's interracial marriage law violated this principle, as it denied equal protection to interracial couples. The law was therefore deemed unconstitutional.
Haz clic para calificar: