Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
Read the excerpt and answer the question that follows. But it taxes our credulity to say that mere chance resulted in their [sic] being no members of this class among the over six thousand jurors called in the past 25 years. The result bespeaks discrimination __ [Hernandez's] only claim is the right to be indi-ted and tried by juries from which all menbers of his class are not 1- juries selected from among all qualified persons regardless of n uescen!. To this much,he is entitled by the constitutio n. -Chief Justice Earl Warren, Hernandez v.Texas, May 3, 1954 How did the Supreme Court decision affect judicial interpretations of the Constitution? A By expanding equal protection rights B By eliminating due process protections C By limiting free expression D By expanding the right of religious freedom

Problemas

Read the excerpt and answer the question that follows. But it taxes our credulity to say that mere chance resulted in their [sic] being no members of this class among the over six thousand jurors called in the past 25 years. The result bespeaks discrimination __ [Hernandez's] only claim is the right to be indi-ted and tried by juries from which all menbers of his class are not 1- juries selected from among all qualified persons regardless of n uescen!. To this much,he is entitled by the constitutio n. -Chief Justice Earl Warren, Hernandez v.Texas, May 3, 1954 How did the Supreme Court decision affect judicial interpretations of the Constitution? A By expanding equal protection rights B By eliminating due process protections C By limiting free expression D By expanding the right of religious freedom

Read the excerpt and answer the question that follows. But it taxes our credulity to say that mere chance resulted in their [sic] being no members of this class among the over six thousand jurors called in the past 25 years. The result bespeaks discrimination __ [Hernandez's] only claim is the right to be indi-ted and tried by juries from which all menbers of his class are not 1- juries selected from among all qualified persons regardless of n uescen!. To this much,he is entitled by the constitutio n. -Chief Justice Earl Warren, Hernandez v.Texas, May 3, 1954 How did the Supreme Court decision affect judicial interpretations of the Constitution? A By expanding equal protection rights B By eliminating due process protections C By limiting free expression D By expanding the right of religious freedom

Solución

avatar
Juliánveterano · Tutor durante 10 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.7 (437 votos)

Responder

By expanding equal protection rights<br /><br />The Supreme Court decision in Hernandez v. Texas (1954) expanded equal protection rights under the Constitution by recognizing that Mexican Americans and all other racial groups in the United States had equal protection under the 14th Amendment. The ruling held that the systematic exclusion of Mexican Americans from serving on juries violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. This decision was significant in expanding civil rights and ensuring that all racial groups were entitled to equal protection under the law.
Haz clic para calificar: