Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
1.This list highlights some focts from a U.S.Supreme Court case during the 1960 s. Mapp v. Ohlo (1961) Police officers forcibly entered a house without a warrant. - Officers arrested house owner Dollree Mapp for having Illegal photographs. - Mapp appealed to the Supreme Court, saying that her constitutional liberties had been violoted - The Supreme Court decided in favor of Mapp. Based on the facts of this case and your knowledge of constitutional rights which outcome resulted from this U.S. Supreme Court decision? A Constitutional guarantees of due process in criminal trials were increased. Constitutional protections agalnst unlawful searches and selzures were expanded. (C) Constitutional assurances of the right to an attorney were expanded. (6) Constitutional safeguards against excessive balls and fines were increased.

Problemas

1.This list highlights some focts from a U.S.Supreme Court case during the 1960 s.
Mapp v. Ohlo (1961)
Police officers forcibly entered a house without a warrant.
- Officers arrested house owner Dollree Mapp for having Illegal photographs.
- Mapp appealed to the Supreme Court, saying that her constitutional liberties had been violoted
- The Supreme Court decided in favor of Mapp.
Based on the facts of this case and your knowledge of constitutional rights which outcome resulted from this U.S.
Supreme Court decision?
A Constitutional guarantees of due process in criminal trials were increased.
Constitutional protections agalnst unlawful searches and selzures were expanded.
(C) Constitutional assurances of the right to an attorney were expanded.
(6) Constitutional safeguards against excessive balls and fines were increased.

1.This list highlights some focts from a U.S.Supreme Court case during the 1960 s. Mapp v. Ohlo (1961) Police officers forcibly entered a house without a warrant. - Officers arrested house owner Dollree Mapp for having Illegal photographs. - Mapp appealed to the Supreme Court, saying that her constitutional liberties had been violoted - The Supreme Court decided in favor of Mapp. Based on the facts of this case and your knowledge of constitutional rights which outcome resulted from this U.S. Supreme Court decision? A Constitutional guarantees of due process in criminal trials were increased. Constitutional protections agalnst unlawful searches and selzures were expanded. (C) Constitutional assurances of the right to an attorney were expanded. (6) Constitutional safeguards against excessive balls and fines were increased.

Solución

avatar
Valentinaveterano · Tutor durante 9 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.7 (165 votos)

Responder

B

Explicar

## Step 1<br />The problem presents a case, Mapp v. Ohio (1961), where the police officers forcibly entered a house without a warrant and arrested the house owner, Dollree Mapp, for possessing illegal photographs. Mapp appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that her constitutional rights had been violated.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mapp, which implies that the court found the police's actions to be unconstitutional.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The question asks us to identify the constitutional right that was expanded as a result of this Supreme Court decision. The options provided are:<br />A) Constitutional guarantees of due process in criminal trials were increased.<br />B) Constitutional protections against unlawful searches and seizures were expanded.<br />C) Constitutional assurances of the right to an attorney were expanded.<br />D) Constitutional safeguards against excessive bail and fines were increased.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Given the context of the case, where the police officers conducted an unlawful search and seizure, the most appropriate answer is option B, which states that the Supreme Court decision expanded constitutional protections against unlawful searches and seizures.
Haz clic para calificar: