Which statement describes the idea of judicial restraint? Judges make decisions with little regard to earlier court decisions or government views. Congress prevents judges from interfering with any bills that Congress passes. Judges are less likely to change a law unless it is an obvious breach of the Constitution Congress is restricted from passing bills until the federal judges allow them to continue

## Step 1<br />Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. It asserts that judges should avoid drawing their own conclusions about the law and instead rely on the literal meaning of the law as written by the legislature.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The concept of judicial restraint is based on the belief that the judiciary should not interfere with the legislative and executive branches of government. This means that judges should not make decisions that go beyond the scope of their authority or interfere with the legislative process.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Judicial restraint also implies that judges should not change laws unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution. This means that judges should not make decisions that go beyond the scope of their authority or interfere with the legislative process.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Looking at the options provided, the one that best describes the idea of judicial restraint is "Judges are less likely to change a law unless it is an obvious breach of the Constitution". This statement aligns with the concept of judicial restraint, which encourages judges to limit their own power and rely on the literal meaning of the law as written by the legislature.