Problemas
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63cae/63caeb0005c91fa4a52ef3c0774d5a346dd19ce2" alt="Though there were many differing opinions about progressivism in the early twentieth century, a common assumption among progressives in that period was that
Mulple Coce
the blssee-taie phlosophy should be embraced in American pollics.
urbanization was harmful to the United States.
individual rights should be expanded as widely as possible.
American society was capable of improvement but needed direct human intervention.
Social Danvinism could create social order and stability."
Though there were many differing opinions about progressivism in the early twentieth century, a common assumption among progressives in that period was that Mulple Coce the blssee-taie phlosophy should be embraced in American pollics. urbanization was harmful to the United States. individual rights should be expanded as widely as possible. American society was capable of improvement but needed direct human intervention. Social Danvinism could create social order and stability.
Solución
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bab9d/bab9dccfad388a4933f59b2317a847d8973914b6" alt="avatar"
Benjamínmaestro · Tutor durante 5 años
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72bdc/72bdc75232b34e3df14165d4f3a1efc0ca6d53be" alt="expert verified"
4.3 (244 votos)
Responder
The correct answer is: American society was capable of improvement but needed direct human intervention.<br /><br />Progressives in the early twentieth century generally believed that American society could be improved through reforms and that active efforts, often by the government or other organized groups, were necessary to address social, economic, and political issues. This belief in the need for direct human intervention to foster progress and reform distinguishes progressivism from other philosophies of the time.
Haz clic para calificar: