Pagina de inicio
/
Ciencias Sociales
/
could take 1. Develope mandatory, as it is in Australia, Belgium,Mexico.sited States and 18 other nations. 18 other Singapore, In your essay, you must - Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning -Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information: At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents: - Article I of the Constitution - First Amendment of the Constitution Use a second piece of evidence from the list above or from your study of modern voting and voter behavior and elections - Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/ thesis - Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal

Problemas

could take
1. Develope mandatory, as it is in Australia, Belgium,Mexico.sited States
and 18 other nations. 18 other Singapore,
In your essay, you must
- Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and
establishes a line of reasoning
-Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and
relevant information:
At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following
foundational documents:
- Article I of the Constitution
- First Amendment of the Constitution
Use a second piece of evidence from the list above or from your
study of modern voting and voter behavior and elections
- Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/
thesis
- Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation,
concession, or rebuttal

could take 1. Develope mandatory, as it is in Australia, Belgium,Mexico.sited States and 18 other nations. 18 other Singapore, In your essay, you must - Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning -Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information: At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents: - Article I of the Constitution - First Amendment of the Constitution Use a second piece of evidence from the list above or from your study of modern voting and voter behavior and elections - Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/ thesis - Respond to an opposing or alternative perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal

Solución

avatar
Luciamaestro · Tutor durante 5 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.1 (229 votos)

Responder

Thesis: The United States should implement mandatory voting, similar to the systems in place in Australia, Belgium, Mexico, and 18 other nations, as it would increase voter participation, ensure a more representative democracy, and uphold the principles of civic duty and equality.<br /><br />Supporting Evidence #1: Article I, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states that "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof." This suggests that the framers of the Constitution recognized the importance of ensuring broad participation in the electoral process.<br /><br />Supporting Evidence #2: According to a study by the Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), mandatory voting has been shown to increase voter turnout by an average of 20 percentage points in countries with compulsory voting laws. This evidence supports the claim that mandatory voting would lead to higher levels of political engagement and a more representative democracy.<br /><br />Reasoning: The principles of civic duty and equality, as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, suggest that all citizens should have an opportunity to participate in the democratic process. Mandatory voting would ensure that a wider range of voices are heard, leading to more representative and accountable government. Additionally, by increasing voter turnout, mandatory voting would help to address the issue of political disengagement and the growing trend of voter apathy in the United States.<br /><br />Opposing Perspective: Some may argue that mandatory voting infringes on individual freedom and the right to abstain from political participation. However, this perspective fails to consider the importance of ensuring broad representation in a democratic system. By requiring citizens to vote, mandatory voting would help to ensure that the will of the people is accurately reflected in the outcomes of elections.<br /><br />In conclusion, the United States should implement mandatory voting to increase voter participation, ensure a more representative democracy, and uphold the principles of civic duty and equality. While some may argue that mandatory voting infringes on individual freedom, the evidence suggests that it would lead to higher levels of political engagement and a more accountable government.
Haz clic para calificar: