In Shelby County v.Holder, the Supreme Court: A abolished literacy tests as a requirement for voting B abolished the grandfather clauses that excepted white voters from literacy tests C abolished the Voting Rights Act of 1965 D eliminated the requirement that states get the approval of the Federal government to change voting laws

## Step 1<br />The problem is a multiple-choice question related to a specific Supreme Court case, Shelby County v. Holder. The question asks us to identify the correct outcome of this case.<br />## Step 2<br />The Supreme Court case Shelby County v. Holder is a significant case in the context of voting rights in the United States. The case revolved around the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was a federal law designed to prevent racial discrimination in voting.<br />## Step 3<br />The Supreme Court's decision in this case was to eliminate the requirement that certain states and counties, primarily in the South, must obtain federal approval before changing their voting laws or practices. This federal approval was known as "preclearance".<br />## Step 4<br />The Supreme Court's decision did not abolish literacy tests or the grandfather clauses, nor did it abolish the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Therefore, options A, B, and C are incorrect.<br />## Step 5<br />The correct answer is option D, which states that the Supreme Court eliminated the requirement that states get the approval of the Federal government to change voting laws.