Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
What did the Supreme Court rule in the case Near v. Minnesota? A state could not punish a newspaper by forcing it to stop publication. Public figures could not sue for emotional distress if they were subjected to satire. Separate but equal education was unconstitutional. The U.S. government could not use general claims of national security to prevent a newspaper from publishing.

Problemas

What did the Supreme Court rule in the case Near v. Minnesota? A state could not punish a newspaper by forcing it to stop publication. Public figures could not sue for emotional distress if they were subjected to satire. Separate but equal education was unconstitutional. The U.S. government could not use general claims of national security to prevent a newspaper from publishing.

What did the Supreme Court rule in the case Near v. Minnesota? A state could not punish a newspaper by forcing it to stop publication. Public figures could not sue for emotional distress if they were subjected to satire. Separate but equal education was unconstitutional. The U.S. government could not use general claims of national security to prevent a newspaper from publishing.

Solución

avatar
Marioélite · Tutor durante 8 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.2 (339 votos)

Responder

The Supreme Court ruled in the case Near v. Minnesota that a state could not punish a newspaper by forcing it to stop publication. This decision established the principle of prior restraint, which holds that the government cannot prohibit publication in advance, except under exceptional circumstances.
Haz clic para calificar: