Ted Cruz said that he disagreed with President Trump's policy on providing federal funding for Planned Parenthood. How could he have corrected Senator Cruzzzz without using an ad hominem? Edit View Insert Format Tools Table square

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking for a way to correct Senator Cruz's statement without using an ad hominem argument. An ad hominem argument is a type of fallacy where instead of addressing the argument or the issue, the person making the argument is attacked. This is not a constructive way to engage in a debate or discussion.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />To correct Senator Cruz's statement without using an ad hominem argument, we need to focus on the issue at hand, which is the policy on providing federal funding for Planned Parenthood. We need to present a counter-argument that is based on the merits of the policy, rather than attacking Senator Cruz personally.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />We can present a counter-argument by stating that the policy on providing federal funding for Planned Parenthood is a critical issue that affects the health and well-being of many people. We can argue that the policy is necessary to ensure that everyone has access to healthcare services, regardless of their socioeconomic status.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />We can also argue that the policy is not just about providing funding for Planned Parenthood, but it is about ensuring that everyone has access to healthcare services. This is a broader issue that affects the health and well-being of the entire population.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Finally, we can argue that the policy is not just about providing funding for Planned Parenthood, but it is about ensuring that everyone has access to healthcare services. This is a broader issue that affects the health and well-being of the entire population.