When scientists uncover a fossil, they record the precise location where the fossil was found. Does this location provide useful evidence for conclusions about the fossil and evolutionary processes? A. Yes; patterns in the distributions of fossils and living species are useful evidence of evolution The study of the geographical distribution of organisms on Earth is known as biogeography. B. No; evidence for evolution comes only from body structures, not the environment of organisms. The study of the body structures of organisms is known as anatomical homologies. C. Yes; evolution occurs only in certain locations on Earth. The study of which specific locations evolution occurred in is known as biogeography. D. No; evidence for evolution comes only from similarities and differences in genes. The study of genetics in fossils and living species is known as molecular homology.

## Step 1<br />The question is asking whether the location where a fossil is found provides useful evidence for conclusions about the fossil and evolutionary processes. <br /><br />## Step 2<br />Option A states that patterns in the distributions of fossils and living species are useful evidence of evolution. This is correct because the geographical distribution of organisms on Earth, known as biogeography, can provide evidence of evolution. <br /><br />## Step 3<br />Option B suggests that evidence for evolution comes only from body structures, not the environment of organisms. This is incorrect because evidence for evolution can come from various sources, including the environment of organisms.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Option C suggests that evolution occurs only in certain locations on Earth. This is incorrect because evolution can occur anywhere on Earth, not just in certain locations.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Option D suggests that evidence for evolution comes only from similarities and differences in genes. This is incorrect because evidence for evolution can come from various sources, including the environment of organisms.