3. What is Borah's main argument?Do you find it convincing? Why or why not? Is it conservative or liberal? Source: William Borah, Speech in United States Senate December 6, 1918. The first proposition connected with the proposed league is that of a tribunal to settle the matters of controversy which may arise between the different nations. Will anyone advocate that those matters which are of vital importance to our people shall be submit- ted to a tribunal created other than by our own people and give it an internationa I army subject to its direction and control to enforce its decrees?I doubt if anyone will advocate that. __ If you do not do so, Mr. President ,what will your league amount to? __ In its last analysis the proposition is force to destroy force, conflict to prevent conflict, militarism to destroy militarism, war to prevent war In its last analysis it must be that if it has any sanction behind its judgment at all. There is where the difficulty lies. __

Borah's main argument is that the proposed league, which likely refers to the League of Nations, would submit matters of vital importance to the United States to an international tribunal created by other nations. He argues that this would undermine the sovereignty of the United States and place its affairs under the control of an international army. Borah questions the effectiveness of such a league, stating that it would ultimately be about force to destroy force, conflict to prevent conflict, and war to prevent war. He questions the legitimacy of the league's authority and its ability to enforce its judgments.<br /><br />Whether Borah's argument is convincing depends on one's perspective. From a conservative viewpoint, his argument may be seen as convincing because it emphasizes the importance of national sovereignty and the potential loss of control over domestic affairs. From a liberal viewpoint, his argument may be seen as less convincing because it downplays the benefits of international cooperation and the potential for peace and stability that the League of Nations could provide.<br /><br />Overall, Borah's argument is conservative in nature, as it emphasizes the importance of national sovereignty and the potential risks of international cooperation.