What does the term "begging the question" imply? The argument is based on emotional appeal The conclusion is assumed in the premise The argument is logically sound ) The argument presents a false analogy Which of the following is a characteristic of a false analogy? It compares two similar situations ) It compares two unrelated situations It provides statistical evidence It presents a logical conclusion What is the main issue with a post hoc argument? It assumes causation without evidence It relies on emotional appeal It presents a logical contradiction It uses statistical data 3 poi 3 points 2 points

## Step 1<br />The term "begging the question" is a logical fallacy where the conclusion is assumed in the premise. This means that the argument is based on an assumption that has not been proven, which is a form of circular reasoning.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />A false analogy is a type of logical fallacy where two things that are not really alike are compared. The characteristic of a false analogy is that it compares two unrelated situations. This is done to make a point about one thing by comparing it to another thing.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />A post hoc argument is a logical fallacy where it is assumed that because one event followed another, the first event must have caused the second. The main issue with a post hoc argument is that it assumes causation without evidence. This means that it assumes that because one event happened after another, the first event must have caused the second, without any evidence to support this claim.