Problemas
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe6a6/fe6a68394ad2f5e3cf4bdd35044126d827470a10" alt="Having political values in favor of strong national security would likely mean which of the following?
A a slow but steady increase in levels of support for the military and patriotism felt by members of the society
B a decrease in institutional racism because the military is organized by the government, which is racially-integrated
C policy trade-offs in which the military would get more funding and other social programs would get less
D a far greater likelihood that countries will end up going to war given that there is a focus on militarization"
Having political values in favor of strong national security would likely mean which of the following? A a slow but steady increase in levels of support for the military and patriotism felt by members of the society B a decrease in institutional racism because the military is organized by the government, which is racially-integrated C policy trade-offs in which the military would get more funding and other social programs would get less D a far greater likelihood that countries will end up going to war given that there is a focus on militarization
Solución
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e813/6e81377c6fad25e8c581946f148ebea2cf9b0e40" alt="avatar"
Ivettemaestro · Tutor durante 5 años
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72bdc/72bdc75232b34e3df14165d4f3a1efc0ca6d53be" alt="expert verified"
4.2 (260 votos)
Responder
The most likely outcome of having political values that favor strong national security is 'C. policy trade-offs in which the military would get more funding and other social programs would get less'.
Explicar
## Step 1<br />The problem is asking us to identify the most likely outcome of having political values that favor strong national security. The options provided are:<br />A. a slow but steady increase in levels of support for the military and patriotism felt by members of the society<br />B. a decrease in institutional racism because the military is organized by the government, which is racially-integrated<br />C. policy trade-offs in which the military would get more funding and other social programs would get less<br />D. a far greater likelihood that countries will end up going to war given that there is a focus on militarization<br /><br />## Step 2<br />We need to analyze each option in relation to the concept of strong national security.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Option A suggests that there would be an increase in support for the military and patriotism. While this could be a result of strong national security, it is not a direct consequence.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Option B suggests that there would be a decrease in institutional racism because the military is organized by the government, which is racially-integrated. This is not a direct consequence of strong national security.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Option C suggests that there would be policy trade-offs in which the military would get more funding and other social programs would get less. This is a direct consequence of strong national security, as it would likely mean that more resources would be allocated to the military.<br /><br />## Step 6<br />Option D suggests that there would be a greater likelihood that countries will end up going to war given that there is a focus on militarization. This is not a direct consequence of strong national security.
Haz clic para calificar: