arguments before you-not arguments for the suffrage , because I said when I opened , I didn't mean to do that-but arguments for the adoption of militant methods in order to win political rights. What is the primary argument that Pankhurst makes in this speech? Choose 1 answer: A All suffragists are capable of using militant methods and thus need to advocate for women's suffrage themselves. B English suffragists have experienced I enormous success using B revolutionary methods, so American suffragists should adopt those methods, too. C American women are humans suffering from injustice and are therefore justified in using revolutionary methods to gain rights. D American suffragists have experienced less success than English suffragists and thus need to change their methods.

## Step 1<br />The problem is a comprehension question based on a speech by Pankhurst. The speech is about the adoption of militant methods to win political rights. The task is to identify the primary argument that Pankhurst is making in this speech.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The options provided are interpretations of Pankhurst's argument. The correct answer should accurately reflect the main point of Pankhurst's speech.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Option A suggests that all suffragists are capable of using militant methods and thus need to advocate for women's suffrage themselves. This interpretation does not align with the context of the speech.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Option B suggests that English suffragists have experienced enormous success using revolutionary methods, so American suffragists should adopt those methods, too. This interpretation does not align with the context of the speech.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Option C suggests that American women are humans suffering from injustice and are therefore justified in using revolutionary methods to gain rights. This interpretation aligns with the context of the speech.<br /><br />## Step 6<br />Option D suggests that American suffragists have experienced less success than English suffragists and thus need to change their methods. This interpretation does not align with the context of the speech.