Lamarck believed that over time, it appeared as if those animals that did not use their tails, lost their tails in future generations. How does this explanation contradict? selection? A Lamarck believed that characteristics acquired during an organism's lifetime could be passed down to offspring, while Darwin argued that only genetic variations, not acqui drive evolution B. Lamarck suggested that natural selection of operates rapidly, causing immediate changes yes in a species, while Darwin proposed that evolution occurs slowly over time C. Lamarck argued that genetic mu mutations occur randomly, while Darwin emphasized that only environmental pressures determine which traits are passed on D. Lamarck claimed that all traits are passed down equally, whereas Danwin believed that s some traits are more beneficial and increase an organism's chances of survival

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking us to identify the statement that best explains how Lamarck's theory contradicts Darwin's theory of evolution. Lamarck's theory, also known as Lamarckism, proposed that an organism can change during its lifetime in response to its environment, and those changes are passed on to its offspring. This is often referred to as the "inheritance of acquired characteristics".<br /><br />## Step 2<br />On the other hand, Darwin's theory of evolution, also known as the theory of natural selection, proposed that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />By comparing the two theories, we can see that the main difference lies in the mechanism of evolution. Lamarck's theory suggests that changes acquired during an organism's lifetime can be passed on to its offspring, while Darwin's theory suggests that only genetic variations, not acquired characteristics, drive evolution.