How did the Supreme Court reinterpret the provisions of the 13th Amendment in the 1969 case Jones v. Mayer? A. The Court ruled that the 13th Amendment did not ban racial discrimination by private individuals,only by the government. D. The Court expanded the 13th Amendment's protections against racial discrimination to nclude granting African Americans the same rights as whites in buying or ranting a home. C. The Court decided that Congress did not have the power under the 13th Amendment to pass laws against racial discrimination and could not abolish the "badge of stavery: D. The Courtheld that the 13th Amendment took precedence over all later civil rights laws passed by Congress.

## Step 1<br />The Supreme Court case Jones v. Mayer in 1968 was a significant case in the interpretation of the 13th Amendment. The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the 13th Amendment's protections against racial discrimination extended to private individuals, not just the government. This was a significant expansion of the Amendment's protections.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The Court's ruling in this case was a departure from the previous interpretation that the 13th Amendment only applied to government actions, not private individuals. This ruling was a significant step in the fight against racial discrimination in the United States.