A Moving to the next question prevents changes to this answer. Question 27 Under admirally jurisdiction.which of the following would not be considered a "ressel in navigation"? a. An intermational cargo ship b. A tugboat that never leaves its harbor Oc. An oil-drilling rig permanently affixed to the ocean floor d. A forry capable of carrying up to 200 passengers

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking us to identify which of the given options would not be considered a "vessel in navigation" under admiralty jurisdiction. Admiralty jurisdiction refers to the legal authority of a court to hear and decide cases involving maritime law.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />A "vessel in navigation" is defined as a watercraft that is capable of moving on water and is used for transportation or other commercial purposes. This includes ships, boats, and other watercraft that are used for transportation or other commercial purposes.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Looking at the options, we can see that options a, c, and d all describe watercraft that are capable of moving on water and are used for transportation or other commercial purposes. Therefore, they would be considered "vessels in navigation".<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Option b, however, describes a tugboat that never leaves its harbor. This means it is not used for transportation or other commercial purposes, and it does not move on water. Therefore, it would not be considered a "vessel in navigation".