Suppose you are given these premises: "A chocolate chip cookie is not sour.An oatmeal cookie is not sour. An Oreo cookie is not sour." Using inductive reasoning, what conclusion could you draw from these premises? Some cookies are sweet. No cookies are sour. All cookies are sour. All cookies are sweet. All cookies are healthy. Some cookies are sour.

## Step 1<br />Inductive reasoning is a type of logical thinking that involves forming generalizations based on personal observations and experiences. It is not a guarantee of truth, but rather a probability.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />In this problem, we are given three premises: "A chocolate chip cookie is not sour", "An oatmeal cookie is not sour", and "An Oreo cookie is not sour". These premises are all about the taste of different types of cookies.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />From these premises, we can infer that none of the cookies mentioned are sour. This is because each of the cookies is stated to not be sour.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />However, we cannot make any definitive conclusions about the taste of all cookies based on these premises. This is because there may be other types of cookies that are sour.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Therefore, the most accurate conclusion we can draw from these premises is that "No cookies are sour". This conclusion is based on the information provided in the premises, and it is the most logical inference we can make.