Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
"So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution;or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case This is of the very essence of judicial duty. If, then, the courts are to regard the constitution, and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply." -John Marshall, decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803) Which of the following statements best summarizes Marshall's argument? Choose 1 answer: A The Supreme Court should judge whether the law or the Constitution ought to determine a case B The Supreme Court should judge whether a law is constitutional C The Supreme Court should judge ordinary acts as equal to the Constitution D The Supreme Court should judge whether both a law and the Constitution apply to a case

Problemas

"So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law
and the constitution apply to a particular case so that the court
must either decide that case conformably to the law,
disregarding the constitution;or conformably to the
constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine
which of these conflicting rules governs the case This is of the
very essence of judicial duty.
If, then, the courts are to regard the constitution, and the
constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature,
the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the
case to which they both apply."
-John Marshall, decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Which of the following statements best summarizes Marshall's argument?
Choose 1 answer:
A The Supreme Court should judge whether the law or the
Constitution ought to determine a case
B The Supreme Court should judge whether a law is constitutional
C The Supreme Court should judge ordinary acts as equal to the
Constitution
D The Supreme Court should judge whether both a law and the
Constitution apply to a case

"So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution;or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case This is of the very essence of judicial duty. If, then, the courts are to regard the constitution, and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply." -John Marshall, decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803) Which of the following statements best summarizes Marshall's argument? Choose 1 answer: A The Supreme Court should judge whether the law or the Constitution ought to determine a case B The Supreme Court should judge whether a law is constitutional C The Supreme Court should judge ordinary acts as equal to the Constitution D The Supreme Court should judge whether both a law and the Constitution apply to a case

Solución

avatar
Gabrielprofessionell · Tutor durante 6 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.3 (217 votos)

Responder

B

Explicar

## Step 1<br />The problem presents a passage from John Marshall's decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803). The passage discusses the role of the Supreme Court in determining whether a law or the Constitution should govern a case.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The passage emphasizes that the Supreme Court must decide which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is a fundamental aspect of judicial duty.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The passage also states that the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature. Therefore, the Constitution, not an ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Based on the above analysis, the statement that best summarizes Marshall's argument is that the Supreme Court should judge whether a law is constitutional. This is because the Supreme Court must decide which of the conflicting rules (the law or the Constitution) governs the case.
Haz clic para calificar: