"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury:we have not only the fingerprints, the lack of an alibi, a clear motive, and an expressec I desire to commit the robbery... We also have video of the suspect breaking in. The case could not be more open and shut." Logos Scare Tactics Pathos Ethos

## Step 1<br />The problem involves identifying the rhetorical appeal used in the given statement. The speaker is using a combination of different rhetorical appeals to convince the jury of the guilt of the suspect.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The speaker uses Logos, which is an appeal to logic. This is evident in the statement "We have not only the fingerprints, the lack of an alibi, a clear motive, and an expressed desire to commit the robbery". These are all logical pieces of evidence that point towards the suspect's guilt.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The speaker also uses Ethos, which is an appeal to credibility or character. This is shown in the statement "We also have video of the suspect breaking in". This is a credible piece of evidence that supports the speaker's argument.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The speaker also uses Pathos, which is an appeal to emotion. This is shown in the statement "The case could not be more open and shut". This statement is designed to evoke a sense of certainty and finality in the jury, appealing to their emotions.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />The speaker also uses Scare Tactics, which is an appeal to fear. This is shown in the statement "The case could not be more open and shut". This statement is designed to evoke a sense of fear in the jury, making them more likely to believe the speaker's argument.