Read the two passages about school uniforms. Passage 1 School uniforms could alter students' attitudes toward their education. If students wear the same clothing each day, they will not have to think about what to wear on a daily basis In addition, having a uniform could boost students' confidence and reduce envy or embarrassment.Conforming to one uniform might also help students fit in more easily. Passage 2 School uniforms have no place in education especially since we are trying to instill the principles of individuality and diversity in our children. School uniforms destroy students'abilities to be themselves have seen schools where uniforms are required; the students' faces tell the whole story. By enforcing __ Which statement best compares how the authors develop their arguments? Passage 1 uses a logical approach, while passage 2 contains appeals to emotion. Passage 1 uses an emotional appeal, while passage 2 uses mainly understatement. Passage 1 uses empirical evidence, while passage 2 relies on logical evidence. Passage 1 uses an ad hominem attack, while passage 2 has a bandwagon appeal.

## Step 1<br />The first step in solving this problem is to understand the arguments presented in both passages. Passage 1 presents a logical argument, stating that school uniforms could alter students' attitudes towards their education by reducing daily decision-making stress and promoting confidence and acceptance. This argument is based on the assumption that wearing the same clothing each day would eliminate the need for daily decision-making about what to wear, and that this would lead to increased confidence and acceptance among students.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />On the other hand, Passage 2 presents an emotional argument against school uniforms. The author argues that school uniforms suppress individuality and diversity, which are important principles to instill in children. The author uses the phrase "the students' faces tell the whole story" to evoke an emotional response from the reader, suggesting that the students are unhappy or uncomfortable with the uniform policy.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Finally, we compare the two arguments. Passage 1 uses a logical approach, while Passage 2 uses an emotional appeal. This is because Passage 1 presents a logical argument based on the assumption that wearing the same clothing each day would lead to increased confidence and acceptance among students, while Passage 2 uses an emotional appeal by suggesting that school uniforms suppress individuality and diversity, which are important principles to instill in children.