Excerpt from My Love Story by Tina Turner [1] "Tina, will you marry with me?" This was my first proposal from Erwin Bach, the love -at-first-sight love of my life, the man who made me feel dizzy the first time I saw him. His phrasing was a bit Quaint-he's German 50 English is not his first language -but I ked it. He was probably a little surprised when I said, "I don't have an answer"All knew was that it wasn't yes and it wasn't no. This was in 1989, after we had been together for three years.was turning fifty, and Enwin who was thirty-three thought I needed a commitment from him. He was gracious to offer but I loved our relationship just the way it was Plus, I wasn't certain how I felt about marriage. Marrage can change things and, in my experience, not always for the better. [2] Twenty-three years later (so much for not having a commitment, Envin proposed again This time, his timing was perfect. We were with a dozen close friends cruising the Mediterranean on our friend Sergio's yacht, the Lady Marina Looking back; I should have known something significant was about to happen. We were somewhere very pretty, but it wasn't romantic enough for Erwin I found out later that he consulted Sergio, who suggested we sall to the Greek island of Skorpios this is the best place I know for a most romantic moment." mindhim QUESTION 2 Turner relays two plot points-Bachis first proposal to her and his second.How does she avoid having to tell all the detalls in between? She includes more people in the second plot point, so it seems as though a lot of time has passed. She just cuts directly to the action without a transition or new context. She uses the transition "twenty-three years later" She adds action in between that shows how much time has passed.

Question

Problemas

Excerpt from My Love Story by Tina Turner [1] "Tina, will you marry with me?" This was my first proposal from Erwin Bach, the love -at-first-sight love of my life, the man who made me feel dizzy the first time I saw him. His phrasing was a bit Quaint-he's German 50 English is not his first language -but I ked it. He was probably a little surprised when I said, "I don't have an answer"All knew was that it wasn't yes and it wasn't no. This was in 1989, after we had been together for three years.was turning fifty, and Enwin who was thirty-three thought I needed a commitment from him. He was gracious to offer but I loved our relationship just the way it was Plus, I wasn't certain how I felt about marriage. Marrage can change things and, in my experience, not always for the better. [2] Twenty-three years later (so much for not having a commitment, Envin proposed again This time, his timing was perfect. We were with a dozen close friends cruising the Mediterranean on our friend Sergio's yacht, the Lady Marina Looking back; I should have known something significant was about to happen. We were somewhere very pretty, but it wasn't romantic enough for Erwin I found out later that he consulted Sergio, who suggested we sall to the Greek island of Skorpios this is the best place I know for a most romantic moment." mindhim QUESTION 2 Turner relays two plot points-Bachis first proposal to her and his second.How does she avoid having to tell all the detalls in between? She includes more people in the second plot point, so it seems as though a lot of time has passed. She just cuts directly to the action without a transition or new context. She uses the transition "twenty-three years later" She adds action in between that shows how much time has passed.

Answer 1

The correct answer is 'C'. Tina Turner uses the transition "twenty-three years later" to indicate the passage of time between her first and second proposal from Erwin Bach.

Answer 2

## Step 1 The problem is asking us to identify the method Tina Turner uses to avoid providing detailed information about the events that occurred between her first and second proposal from Erwin Bach. The options provided suggest different ways she could have done this. ## Step 2 The first option suggests that she includes more people in the second plot point, which would imply that a lot of time has passed. However, the text does not provide any evidence that more people are involved in the second proposal. ## Step 3 The second option suggests that she cuts directly to the action without a transition or new context. However, the text does provide a transition ("twenty-three years later"), which indicates that a significant amount of time has passed. ## Step 4 The third option suggests that she uses the transition "twenty-three years later". This is indeed the case, as the text clearly states "Twenty-three years later", indicating that a significant amount of time has passed. ## Step 5 The fourth option suggests that she adds action in between that shows how much time has passed. However, the text does not provide any additional action that indicates the passage of time.

Problemas

Solución

Responder

Explicar