Prompt: There is a major shortage of kidneys available for transplant. Should an individual be allowed to sell a kidney to a facility or an individual in renal failure who needs the kidney in order to live and is willing to pay for the kidney?Why or why not?What six basic ethical rules would be involved In the decision?

## Step 1<br />The problem at hand is a complex ethical and legal issue that involves the consideration of individual rights, societal welfare, and the potential for exploitation. The question asks whether an individual should be allowed to sell a kidney to a facility or an individual in renal failure who needs the kidney to live and is willing to pay for it.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The first ethical rule to consider is the principle of 'Do no harm'. This principle is a fundamental principle in medical ethics and it implies that one should not engage in any activity that could potentially harm others. Selling a kidney could potentially harm the seller, as it could lead to physical and psychological consequences.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The second ethical rule to consider is the principle of 'Respect for autonomy'. This principle implies that individuals should be allowed to make their own decisions. However, in this case, the decision to sell a kidney could be influenced by desperation or financial hardship, which could undermine the individual's autonomy.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The third ethical rule to consider is the principle of 'Justice'. This principle implies that resources should be distributed fairly. If kidney transplants become a commodity, it could lead to a situation where only the wealthy can afford them, which would be unjust.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />The fourth ethical rule to consider is the principle of 'Beneficence'. This principle implies that one should act in the best interest of others. In this case, allowing the sale of kidneys could potentially save lives, which would be in the best interest of the individuals in need.<br /><br />## Step 6<br />The fifth ethical rule to consider is the principle of 'Non-maleficence'. This principle implies that one should not cause harm to others. Allowing the sale of kidneys could potentially lead to exploitation and harm to the sellers, which would violate this principle.<br /><br />## Step 7<br />The sixth ethical rule to consider is the principle of 'Informed consent'. This principle implies that individuals should be fully informed about the risks and benefits of a decision before they make it. In this case, the individual selling the kidney should be fully informed about the risks and benefits of the sale.