Ayuda para la tarea de derecho

Esta es una herramienta de asistencia legal basada en tecnología de procesamiento de lenguaje natural que puede ayudar a los usuarios a encontrar rápidamente textos legales y explicaciones relevantes ingresando preguntas o palabras clave. La ayuda para la asignación de leyes utiliza los modelos GPT de OpenAI para analizar de manera inteligente las dudas del usuario y brindar respuestas relacionadas con esas preguntas legales. Al mismo tiempo, el proyecto puede aprender y optimizarse continuamente en función de los comentarios de los usuarios.

La ayuda con la tarea de derecho es un asistente legal de IA basado en la API OpenAI y la base de datos pgvector que puede ayudar a los usuarios a consultar y comprender rápidamente las leyes y regulaciones de los estados de EE. UU. y los principales países del mundo. Vale la pena ayudar a la gente corriente a comprender y aplicar mejor la ley y mejorar los conocimientos jurídicos.

6. Bob, an IRS tax law-certified volunteer preparer told the taxpayer that cash income does not need to be reported because the IRS does not know about it:Bob indicated NO cash income on Form 13614-C. Bob prepared a tax return excluding the cash income Jim, the designated quality reviewer, was unaware of the conversation and therefore unaware of the cash income and the return was printed, signed, and e filed. Who violated the Volunteer Standards of Conduct? a. Bob, the tax law-certified volunteer who prepared the return. b. Jim, the designated quality reviewer who was unaware of the cash income when he reviewed the return. C. Betty, the coordinator d. No one has violated the Volunteer Standards of Conduct.

..."Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This disposition makes unnec ssary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the we Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? 1 Opinion of the Court Brown v. Board of Education, 1954 How did the Supreme Court rule in the case of Brown v.Board of Education AND how did it impact American society? They believe it was agaisnt the-4th amendment.wearing b nonviolent. I

Question 1-17 We conclude that, in the field of public education, the dgetrine of "separate but equal"has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal Therefore, we hold,thet the plaintiffs __ are __ deprived of the equá protection/of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. -Chief Justice Earl Warrén, Brown v. Board of Education, May 17,1954 Which action occurred as a result of the Supreme Court decision described above? The requirement of equal access to school facilities for disabled students The expansion of math and science in school curriculum The requirement of new training procedures for teachers in public schools The desegregation of public schools

Question 1-16 We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.Therefore, we hold/that the plaintiffs __ __ deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. -Chief Justice Earl Warren Brown v. Board of Education, May 17,1954 Which previous Supreme Court decision had protected the practice described in the excerpt? Sweattv. Palnter Hernandez v. Texas Plessy v. Ferguson Wisconsin v. Yoder

Question 1-16 We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs __ are __ deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. -Chief Justice Earl Warren Brown v. Board of Education, May 17,1954 Which previous Supreme Court decision had protected the practice described in the excerpt? Sweatt v. Paketer Hernandez v. Texas Plessy v. Ferguson Wisconsin v. Yoder