Ayuda para la tarea de derecho
Esta es una herramienta de asistencia legal basada en tecnología de procesamiento de lenguaje natural que puede ayudar a los usuarios a encontrar rápidamente textos legales y explicaciones relevantes ingresando preguntas o palabras clave. La ayuda para la asignación de leyes utiliza los modelos GPT de OpenAI para analizar de manera inteligente las dudas del usuario y brindar respuestas relacionadas con esas preguntas legales. Al mismo tiempo, el proyecto puede aprender y optimizarse continuamente en función de los comentarios de los usuarios.
La ayuda con la tarea de derecho es un asistente legal de IA basado en la API OpenAI y la base de datos pgvector que puede ayudar a los usuarios a consultar y comprender rápidamente las leyes y regulaciones de los estados de EE. UU. y los principales países del mundo. Vale la pena ayudar a la gente corriente a comprender y aplicar mejor la ley y mejorar los conocimientos jurídicos.
- 4. Which of the following statements is true only about authorized biographies? The biographer has the family's permission to write about the subject. The biography does not need to be approved by the subject's representatives. The biographer has no limitations on what he or she can write in the biography. The biographer can have access to the subject's personal records.
- In December 1965, a group of students in Des Moines held a meeting in the home of 16-year- old Christopher Eckhardt to plan a public showing of their Support for a truce in the Vietnam war. They decided to wear black armbands throughout the holiday season and to fast on December 16 and New Year's Eve. The principals of the Des Moines school learned of the plan and met on December 14 to create a policy that stated that any student wearing an armband would be asked to remove it, with refusal to do so resulting in suspension. On December 16. Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt wore their armbands to school and were sent home. The following day,John Tinker did the same with the same result. The students did not return to school until after New Year's Day,the planned end of the protest. Through their parents, the students sued the school district for violating the students' right of expression and sought an injunction to prevent the school district from disciplining the students. The district court dismissed the case and held that the school district's actions were reasonable to uphold school discipline. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision without opinion. Source: https:/www.oyez.org/cases.1968/21 Answer the following questions: What happened in this case? B. minutes /organizations/companies involved? What does each side (party) want? What are the arguments in favor and against each side?
- Which precedent was established by the Supreme Court's ruling in Marbury v. Madison? A. The citizens have the power to question decisions made by the Supreme Court. B. The Supreme Court has the power to regulate trade and establish tariffs. C. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review and can determine the constitutionality of laws. D. The supremacy of the federal government lies in the hands of the Supreme Court.
- What is one right protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution? A. Freedom of choice B. Freedom from cruel and unusual punishment C. Freedom of religion D. Freedom from search and seizure
- The Ninth Amendment guarantees an individual: A. a quick and speedy trial if accused of a crime. B. the right to bear arms for self -protection. C. rights beyond those outlined in the Constitution. D. freedom from self incrimination in court.
