Ayuda para la tarea de derecho
Esta es una herramienta de asistencia legal basada en tecnología de procesamiento de lenguaje natural que puede ayudar a los usuarios a encontrar rápidamente textos legales y explicaciones relevantes ingresando preguntas o palabras clave. La ayuda para la asignación de leyes utiliza los modelos GPT de OpenAI para analizar de manera inteligente las dudas del usuario y brindar respuestas relacionadas con esas preguntas legales. Al mismo tiempo, el proyecto puede aprender y optimizarse continuamente en función de los comentarios de los usuarios.
La ayuda con la tarea de derecho es un asistente legal de IA basado en la API OpenAI y la base de datos pgvector que puede ayudar a los usuarios a consultar y comprender rápidamente las leyes y regulaciones de los estados de EE. UU. y los principales países del mundo. Vale la pena ayudar a la gente corriente a comprender y aplicar mejor la ley y mejorar los conocimientos jurídicos.
- A patient care technician is teaching a patient about HIPAA regulations, Which of the following client statements indicates an understanding of the teaching? "I do not need to give my provider permission to share my health information with my family members." "My provider is required to report if I receive a diagnosis of tuberculosis." "If Irequire an interpreter, my provider cannot share my health information with them." "If Iam injured at work,my employer has a right to see my health information."
- 11.-¿En cuál de las opciones se presentan las DOS bases jurídicas que dan sustento a la cartilla de los derechos sexuales en México? Ley general de los derechos de Niñas , Niños y Adolescentes y los Derechos Humanos. Derechos humanos y constitución y Constitución Politica de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos y Ley general de los derechos de Niñas, Niños y Adolescentes. 12.-Es la correspondencia entre identidad de género y el sexo al nacer: Transgénero Cisgénero No binaria
- Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney. The question then arises whether the provisions of the Constitution, in relation to the personal rights and privileges to which the citizen of a State should be entitled, embraced the negro African race, at that time in this country, or who might afterwards be imported,who had then or should afterwards be made free in any State; and to put it in the power of a single State to make him a citizen of the United States, and endue him with the full rights of citizenship in every other State without their consent? Does the Constitution of the United States act upon him whenever he shall be made free under the laws of a State and raised there to the rank of a citizen, and immediately clothe him with all the privileges of a citizen in every other State, and in its own courts? The court thinks the alfirmative of these propositions cannot be maintained. And if it cannot, the plaintiff in error What claim does Justice Taney make in this passage? that Sanford has the right to enslave Scott that Scott has the right to be emancipated that Scott is not a citizen of Missouri that Sanford cannot sue because he notacitizen
- Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Brown v. Board of Education , written by Justice Warren. Segregation of white and colored children in public schools has a detrimental effect upon the colored children. The impact is greater when it has the sanction of the law, for the policy of separating the races is usually interpreted as denoting the inferiority of the negro group. A sense of inferiority affects the motivation of a child to learn. Segregation with the sanction of law, therefore, has a tendency to (retard) the educational and mental development of negro children and to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racially) integrated school system. Whatever may have been the extent of psychological knowledge at the time of Plessy v. Ferguson,this finding is amply supported by modern authority. Any language in Plessy v. Ferguson contrary to this finding is rejected. Which statement accurately summarizes the opinion of the court? The doctrine of "separate but equal" takes away Black citizens' rights to an equal public education. The doctrine of "separate but equal" shows that equal facilities provide equal opportunities. learn Plessy v. Ferguson is based on dated psychological knowledge that should be rejected.
- Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Brown v. Board of Education written by Justice Warren. Minors of the Negro race, through their legal representatives, seek the aid of the courts in obtaining admission to the public schools of their community on a nonsegregated basis. In each instance, they had been denied admission to schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to race. This segregation was alleged to deprive the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. In each of the cases other than the Delaware case, a three-judge federal district court denied relief to the plaintiffs on the so-called "separate but equal" doctrine announced by this Court in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 Under that doctrine, equality of treatment is accorded when the races are provided substantially equal facilities, even though these facilities be separate. In the Delaware case, the Supreme Court Which statement best describes the passage? Warren explains the students position, then describes how it has been previously handled by the courts. Warren provides reasons why segregation is permissible, then offers evidence to support the reasons. Waren claims that the students don't have grounds to sue, then gives reasons why not. Warren gives a history of segregation in America, then explains how the students fit into that history.
