Ayuda para la tarea de derecho
Esta es una herramienta de asistencia legal basada en tecnología de procesamiento de lenguaje natural que puede ayudar a los usuarios a encontrar rápidamente textos legales y explicaciones relevantes ingresando preguntas o palabras clave. La ayuda para la asignación de leyes utiliza los modelos GPT de OpenAI para analizar de manera inteligente las dudas del usuario y brindar respuestas relacionadas con esas preguntas legales. Al mismo tiempo, el proyecto puede aprender y optimizarse continuamente en función de los comentarios de los usuarios.
La ayuda con la tarea de derecho es un asistente legal de IA basado en la API OpenAI y la base de datos pgvector que puede ayudar a los usuarios a consultar y comprender rápidamente las leyes y regulaciones de los estados de EE. UU. y los principales países del mundo. Vale la pena ayudar a la gente corriente a comprender y aplicar mejor la ley y mejorar los conocimientos jurídicos.
- What is the Miranda rule established by the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona? A. Convicted murderers cannot be subjected to cruel and unusual punishments. a. Police must read criminal suspects their rights before questioning them. C. It is llegal to use force to make a person contess to a crime. D. Adefendint can ask to have their trial moved if they feel threatened.
- How did the Supreme Court reinterpret the provisions of the 13th Amendment in the 1969 case Jones v. Mayer? A. The Court ruled that the 13th Amendment did not ban racial discrimination by private individuals,only by the government. D. The Court expanded the 13th Amendment's protections against racial discrimination to nclude granting African Americans the same rights as whites in buying or ranting a home. C. The Court decided that Congress did not have the power under the 13th Amendment to pass laws against racial discrimination and could not abolish the "badge of stavery: D. The Courtheld that the 13th Amendment took precedence over all later civil rights laws passed by Congress.
- Read this famous quotation from Justice Oliver Wondel Holmos. Which is the best interpretation of Holmes'meaning? The most stringent [strict]protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a paniC." Justice Cliver Wendell Holmes.opinion of the Court Schenck v. United States (1919) A. The right to free speech is absolute and cannot be infringed upon. B. The right to tree speech depends upon how the Constitution is interpreted. C. The right to free speech differs from State to State and circumstance to circumstance. D. The right to free speech does not apply when it infringes upon the rights and safety of others.
- What is the general rule used by the Supreme Court when deciding I ow disobedience is a constructionally protected right? A. the protest is nomiolent, then ow disobedence is protected by the First Amendment right to free assembly B. Chidsobedience is not protected by the First Amendment and so protestors may be charged it they break any LINS C. When the laws beng proessed are unconstational then cividisobedience is protected by the First Amendment. D. Acts of ow discbedience are not protected it camed out on public property, but have First Amendment pretection on private property
- The excerpt contains opinions of Justices Hugo Black and William O.Douglas in the Supreme Court's decision on the Pentagon Papers case (New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713,1971) We do not believe that the publication by the Times and the Post of the material in question would cause direct and immediate harm to the security of the United States. The guarding of military and diplomatic secrets at the expense of an informed representative government provides no real security for our Republic. - Paraphrased from the Supreme Court Decision on the Pentagon Which constitutional protection did the Supreme Court uphold in its decision regarding the publication of the material referenced in the excerpt above? The right to a fair trial Freedom of the press The right to bear arms Protection against self-incrimination