Ayuda para la tarea de derecho
Esta es una herramienta de asistencia legal basada en tecnología de procesamiento de lenguaje natural que puede ayudar a los usuarios a encontrar rápidamente textos legales y explicaciones relevantes ingresando preguntas o palabras clave. La ayuda para la asignación de leyes utiliza los modelos GPT de OpenAI para analizar de manera inteligente las dudas del usuario y brindar respuestas relacionadas con esas preguntas legales. Al mismo tiempo, el proyecto puede aprender y optimizarse continuamente en función de los comentarios de los usuarios.
La ayuda con la tarea de derecho es un asistente legal de IA basado en la API OpenAI y la base de datos pgvector que puede ayudar a los usuarios a consultar y comprender rápidamente las leyes y regulaciones de los estados de EE. UU. y los principales países del mundo. Vale la pena ayudar a la gente corriente a comprender y aplicar mejor la ley y mejorar los conocimientos jurídicos.
- What is a protected class, as defined by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)? A. An educational institution that does not have to take affirmative action into account B. A type of lawsuit that is automatically referred to the Supreme Court C. A group that is legally protected against employment discrimination D. A racial or ethnic minority that can prove a history of discrimination by the U.S government
- Which part of the Fourteenth Amendment defines anyone born or naturalized in the United States as a citizen? A. The enforcement clause B. The naturalization clause C. The equal protection clause D. The citizenship clause
- Question 9 of 10 1954: In Hernandez v.Texas, the Supreme Court rules that trying a defendant before a jury that deliberately excludes members of the defendant's ethnic group violates the equal protection clause. 1996: In United States v. Virginia, the Supreme Court rules that a military school must provide women with equal treatment by admitting them to the same program as men. 2015: In Obergefell v.Hodges, the Supreme Court rules that state laws forbidding same-sex marriage violate the equal protection clause. What do the events in this timeline suggest abdut how the Supreme Court has interpreted equal protection? A. It has interpreted equal protection as applying to different groups of people. B. It has interpreted equal protection as less important in the 21st century. C. It has interpreted equal protection as not relevant to everyday citizens. D. It has interpreted equal protection as applying at the federal level, not at the state level.
- Which law would a court most likely use strict scrutiny to examine? A. A law that grants maternity leave to mothers but not paternity leave to fathers B. A law that bans Asian and Asian American students from speaking anything but English in school C. A law that prohibits teenagers from driving after dark D. A law that charges experienced pilots less for a pilot's license than new pilots
- What is one possible reason the Supreme Court's interpretation of equal protection has changed over time? A. Segregation has become more socially acceptable. B. The equal protection clause has been updated to reflect new beliefs. C. The Supreme Court itself is more diverse. D. New amendments have made the Fourteenth Amendment stronger.
